Navigation
Motto

 

"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up."

Arthur Koestler 

Entries in False Prophets (19)

Saturday
Jan112014

Word of Knowledge and Baptism for the Dead

Often when someone quotes a Bible verse they do not realize that they have an unstated assumption about the verse. I have called this a template. An example: If you assume that all human souls are immortal,  and then read passages about the afterlife, you will come to different conclusions than if you have a different template, such as the eventual resurrection from the dead for all. If you think "The Law" has been "done away," you will get a different interpretation from some  passages than someone who doesn't.  

There are many examples of this in I Corinthians. I will focus on two for this post. The first is I Corinthinians 15:29:

29 Otherwise, what will those people do who receive baptism on behalf of the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why are people baptized on their behalf? RSV

The Mormons have developed a rather elaborate ritual around this verse. They will research their ancestors, and not wanting them to go to Hell, (another example of the immortality of the soul template) they will be baptized vicariously for any they found who were not baptized as Mormons. My purpose is not to debate the validity of this. I only point out that a template has been placed on top of the verse to justify the practice--which was actually based on an alleged "special revelation" to Joseph Smith Jr.  Click here for the Wikipedia entry if you want for information on this. 

I am quite comfortable with saying I have no idea what Paul meant. This practice, if indeed it was a practice and not a metaphor, has no support anywhere in the Bible. So if someone quotes the verse to justify this kind of baptism, he is reading an idea into the text that may not belong there. In this case I am confident this interpretation does not belong there. 

Another example of this is the template that is placed over I Corinthians 12:8:
But the manifestation of the Spirit is given to every man to profit withal.
For to one is given by the Spirit the word of wisdom; to another the word of knowledge by the same Spirit;
To another faith by the same Spirit; to another the gifts of healing by the same Spirit; KJV

What is the "word of knowledge" and the "word of wisdom"? Neither this passage, nor any other passage in the Bible, defines these terms. 

What is the template that is often used to interpret the passage? Here is what the beloved editor of the Prophecy Podcast, Pam Dewey said on her own site in her "Religious Lingo Lexicon" section: 

In Charismatic circles, someone is said to have a "word of knowledge" when they claim to know something about another person that could not have been known through the five senses. In other words, they are believed to have been given this piece of knowledge by direct divine revelation. Someone who is believed to be able to give such words of knowledge on a regular basis is said to have the "spiritual gift" of the "word of knowledge." This manifestation is often claimed by healing evangelists when they "call out" someone from the audience whom they do not know personally and explain that God has shown them that the person has a certain ailment. Investigative reporters have exposed a number of evangelists over the past few decades as falsifying this alleged gift, by secretly gathering information about audience members. The most notorious of these expose's was regarding televangelist Peter Popoff. 

I have run into this in my life a few times. In each case the supposed "revelation from God" was wrong. In particular my mother was told that she would write a book. She was too ill, she did not. I suppose that I have just never run across a true manifestation of this. I suppose. 

So is someone who thinks that have received special knowledge by divine revelation lying? Some are. Are they insane? Some are. Are many self-deceived? You bet--that is the case for most examples of this. Often the "prophet" is unconsciously using a technique I have written about before called cold reading. This entry also discusses the fake preacher Peter Popoff. 

Is it possible that under very rare circumstances God is actually revealing things? Yes, it is possible, but ask yourself a question: What are the fruits? 


The fruit of a bad tree is bad. 

Oh wait, I was wrong! God has just revealed to me by a word of wisdom that the Mormon doctrine of Baptism of the dead is correct. Since I would never lie to you, it must be true. I suggest those in the Polar Vortex currently in the Eastern US go out and get baptized for your dead unsaved relatives. Do not worry, if you die from pneumonia, one of your relatives can be baptized for you. As Jesus says in John 13:27"What you are about to dodo quickly."

 

Saturday
Jul202013

Decentralization

I think that a large part of the problems in the US are  caused by centralization. 

Here is what one of my favorite bloggers, Charles Smith said on this.

Increasing centralization has been viewed as the solution for all social and economic problems for quite some time.

 The Eurozone project is one recent manifestation of this belief.

The basis of this belief is rationality and efficiency.

 If we centralize production and decision-making, we eliminate all sorts of inefficiencies. Decisions can be made by "top people," and supply chains can be rationalized from a hopelessly inefficient clutter down to a supremely rational and cost-effective pathway.

Ironically, in eliminating inefficiency and messy decision-making, centralization eliminates redundancy, decentralized pathways of response and dissent.

 Once you lose redundancy and all the feedback it represents, you lose resiliency and fault-tolerance. The centralized system is fault-intolerant and fragile.

The emphasis is Smith's. 

It is not that the market system has failed, it is that we do not have a market system. 

In the Noam Chomsky documentary I posted recently, Chomsky said that maybe a capitalist system would work, but we do not have one. I thought that for a left-leaning guild anarchist to admit this was interesting. 

While I will try not to commit the No True Scotsman fallacy I have blogged about before, this critique of our modern system seems correct, almost Old Testamenty. 

In the system God established for His People, each family had a plot of land that was enough for basic food production. To prevent a reprobate, like the prodigal son in the gospels, from wasting away his family’s future, this plot of land could not be sold, only leased for at most 50 years. Thus there was a limit to centralization. Every 50 years, to a degree, there was a reset. The reason I say to a degree is that dwellings were not returned and grazing land was not owned but held in common. 

Our modern society is filled with excessive centralization caused by both greed and the desire of the government to control the people and their wealth. This control is a lot easier if things are centralized. 

Is the way God set things up in ancient Israel a coincidence? Or is it a template we should consider today? 

I have been a church-going kind of guy for 50 years, yet I have only heard this scripture preached once. And the interpretation offered was laughable. No, these verses are not critiquing the suburban lifestyle. 

Isaiah 5:8-10 from the Message, tells us:

8-10 Doom to you who buy up all the houses
    and grab all the land for yourselves—
Evicting the old owners,
    posting NO TRESPASSING signs,
Taking over the country,
    leaving everyone homeless and landless.
I overheard GOD-of-the-Angel-Armies say:
“Those mighty houses will end up empty.
    Those extravagant estates will be deserted.
A ten-acre vineyard will produce a pint of wine,
    a fifty-pound sack of seed, a quart of grain.” 

One of the most interesting things about this prophecy is that it took over a century for it to be fulfilled. But fulfilled it was. 

No, even as much as it sounds like it, this is not a description of modern America. But as Mark Twain sagely commented a century ago, history does not repeat—it rhymes. 

The prophet continues:

11-17 Doom to those who get up early
    and start drinking booze before breakfast,
Who stay up all hours of the night
    drinking themselves into a stupor.
They make sure their banquets are well-furnished
    with harps and flutes and plenty of wine,
But they’ll have nothing to do with the work of GOD,
    pay no mind to what he is doing.
Therefore my people will end up in exile
    because they don’t know the score.
Their “big men” will starve to death
    and the common people die of thirst.
Sheol developed a huge appetite,
    swallowing people nonstop!
Big people and little people alike
    down that gullet, to say nothing of all the drunks.
The down-and-out on a par
    with the high-and-mighty,
Windbag boasters crumpled,
    flaccid as a punctured bladder.
But by working justice,
     GOD-of-the-Angel-Armies will be a mountain.
By working righteousness,
    Holy God will show what “holy” is.
And lambs will graze
    as if they owned the place,
Kids and calves
    right at home in the ruins.

No, the prophet is not talking about alcoholism. He is speaking of excessive consumption, and the example used is one of gluttony. 

The prophet continues in verses 18-19

Doom to you who use lies to sell evil,
    who haul sin to market by the truckload,
Who say, “What’s God waiting for?
    Let him get a move on so we can see it.
Whatever The Holy of Israel has cooked up,
    we’d like to check it out.”

There are two thoughts here. In verse 18 seems to be critiquing our their whole society that is based on lies. I recently canceled Hulu Plus. The main reason was the ads. I think about these things all the time, yet I find myself influenced by the ads. You will be as well, often without even thinking about it. The reason that corporations buy ads is that they work. I am not saying I will never use Hulu again, I might. But it is far more likely I will just wait for the shows to appear on Netflix without ads. 

It seems to me that Verse 19 is the prophet offering up an obvious objection. It has not happened yet, they say, so it will not happen. Remember that it took over one hundred years for this to happen in history. While Isaiah is not speaking to the US, the parallels are so obvious that I wonder if I even need to comment on them? But I do. 

I have heard the next verse quoted, but always out of context. 

20 Doom to you who call evil good
    and good evil,
Who put darkness in place of light
    and light in place of darkness,
Who substitute bitter for sweet
    and sweet for bitter!

No this is not talking about homosexuality. I am not saying that calling the sin of Homosexuality normal is not wrong. It is. I am saying that this is not what the prophet is talking about. 

The prophet is talking about preachers like the late Jerry Fallwell—court preachers, court prophets, defenders of the status quo, and prosperity preachers I blogged about recently. Those that speak of our current version of Babylon as if it is a manifestation of God. No, it is a manifestation of a different spiritual being. Should you think that I am saying that many sincere Christians are worshiping a false god? Yes, you should.   

A true prophet is always on the edge of respectability—or way past that edge. Thus it is no surprise that correct and biting social commentary often comes from the "crazies" in our midst. Chomsky may be a good example of this. Society views him as crazy. Glenn Beck is another example, although a flawed one. He alternates between saying things that need to be said, with being a court prophet. This may explain his popularity.  He does not ask too much from his viewers but feeds their presuppositions. So if you decide to watch him, make sure that your bullshit filter is well maintained. Alas, most people have no filters at all. 

Since Isaiah 5 is a song, as was most Old Testament prophecy, it seems only fitting to conclude with a modern musical version of Isaiah 5 by another "crazy."

While I included much of Isaiah 5 in this blog post, if you want, you can do some "homework" and read Isaiah 5 in its entirety. Even if you are not a believer, I feel you will find it instructive. 

Saturday
Jul062013

An Insider Speaks

One must listen to any insider like this with a skeptical ear. But a lot of this information, like the lavish lifestyles, is not really in dispute. 

Can one participate in modern religious Babylon and not be effected? 

As Proverbs 6:27 says (in reference to adultery but it applies to other situations as well):

Can you build a fire in your lap 

and not burn your pants?

I will conclude this series next Friday and Saturday with a discussion of a common charismatic doctrine and the magical fakery that produces it. 

Friday
Jul052013

TBN Family Battle

It seems to me that any ministry this centralized is doomed to corruption. To a degree the actual false doctrines are less important than the stucture of these types of ministries. I do find it odd that most modern religious groups adopt a centralized structure that mimics ancient Babylon. 

Does the admonition of Revelation 18 for God's people to "Come Out of Babylon" include these type of organizations? 

Tomorrow I will post an adudio interview with the Crouch's granddaughter. 

I knew Paul Crouch's brother as we attended church together in the 90's in Joplin Missouri. 

Monday
Jul012013

Charismatic Confusion

While I am not familiar with this particular preacher, the techniques she uses are familar to me and common among charismatics. The video lets her speak for herself, with some subtitles to make it clear what she is doing. Manipulation is fairly easy to do if you know what you are doing. Note that I do not agree with the poster of this video, I doubt that any satanic sign is offered, but the video is a good start for me to start a blogging series about charismatic confusion.